Coverage: Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back

"Luke, don't jump-- there are spoilers down there!" -Darth Vader

SCRIPT COVERAGE

TITLE:  Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back	SETTING: A galaxy far, far away
AUTHOR:  George Lucas	PERIOD: A long, long time ago
PRODUCER:  Gary Kurtz	ELEMENTS ATTACHED:
SUBMITTED BY:	SUBMITTED TO:
READ BY: Darin Simokov	GENRE: Science Fiction
COVERAGE DATE: 03/30/14	SUBMISSION DATE:

                                                       

	EXCELLENT	VERY GOOD	GOOD	SO-SO	NOT GOOD
PLOT	X
CHARACTERS	X
DIALOGUE	X
STRUCTURE		X
COMMERCIAL APPEAL	X

RECOMMEND:X

CONSIDER:

PASS:

LOG LINE: Luke Skywalker continues his struggle to subdue and eliminate the Galactic Empire, but not without some help from his friends.

SUMMARY: Set three years after its predecessor, Luke receives a vision of his fallen mentor Obi Wan telling him to train under Jedi Grand Master Yoda in the planet Dagobah. Before he can do that, the Imperial fleet attacks the Jedi base in Hoth. After defeating the fleet, being captured, and escaping, Luke travels to planet Dagobah, where Yoda accepts him as his mentor. After training for a while, Luke becomes haunted by premonitions of Leia and Han Solo in danger. So, he cuts his training off early to save them in Cloud City. Unfortunately, Darth Vader arrives before him. Before he freezes Han in a block of carbonite, Han and Leia profess their love for each other. Vader intends to do the same to Luke. Instead, once Luke arrives, they duel with their lightsabers. After some struggle, Vader severs Luke’s right hand. Conveniently for Vader, this hand also contained his lightsaber. Now defenseless, Luke can only look in horror as Vader reveals the truth about his father. Before Luke can accept Vader’s offer to rule the galaxy with him, he falls down an airshaft, escaping what may have been certain death. After being rescued by Leia, they leave to rescue the frozen Han Solo.

COMMENTS: The original Star Wars set a very high bar for science-fiction movies, but The Empire Strikes Back sets it even higher. It contains all of the memorable characters from A New Hope, in new and exciting conflicts (even Obi-Wan makes an appearance, despite his death in the last movie—thank goodness for Force ghosts!). Although this movie build upon many concepts and plots from A New Hope, it stands well enough on it’s own. Each recurring character is re-established, but has added motivation and new goals. Conveniently,the iconic title crawl at the beginning of the movie orients viewers on what happened and what’s to come. The plot is set far enough from the last so that new viewers don’t have to watch the last episode to understand the fifth. Those who have watched the fourth episode are treated to further character development, and more high-stakes situations, captivating plots and masterful cinematography. The special effects may not have aged well (just ask George Lucas after ruining remaking all of them), but still contribute to the sense of immersion you feel—the sense that you’ve been thrusted upon an enthralling science-fiction world, with a believable and interesting cast of characters.

Anyone who watches this movie is also treated to the best plot twist in cinema history. Nowadays, it’s a shame that the twist is so ingrained in our culture, since it ruins the surprise for new first-time watchers. For them, it’s likely that they learn of the twist shortly after they hear of Star Wars for the first time. For those who don’t know, you need to watch Empire immediately. You’d be foolish to not recommend this.

Linear Analysis: Birdemic: Shock and Terror

Our protagonists engage the rabid birds for the first time... with coat hangers.

Like The Room before it, Birdemic: Shock and Terror is one of the worst movies of all time. What separates the two movies apart is that it's painfully obvious that the latter has a more restricted budget. Of course, you don't need millions of dollars to reinforce your movie's ideas. Many directors and cinematographers subtily utilize visual motifs in order to bring these points across. Birdemic may be an awful movie, but there has to be something hidden in it, something that would emblazon a mark of competence on the poor souls that produced this film. Today, I'm going to analyze one 30-minute segment of the film to find out.

Note: This report does contain spoilers, in case you actually care. Spoiler alert: This movie's plot isn't exactly what I'd call "riveting."

These Songs Rock!

For this assignment, I had to analyze five of the best songs of all time. After reviewing three bad songs and a hilariously awful movie, this was a nice change of pace. Let's begin.

TIGHTEN UP by ARCHIE BELL & THE DRELLS

Listening Phase 1 (Rhythm)

Source [where is the rhythm coming from?] A drumset, a bass guitar, and an electric guitar.

Time/Tempo [guess at the time signature] Most likely 6/8, but could also be 4/4.

Groove [describe how the personality of the rhythm] Makes you want to throw your hands up in the air at least every other measure. The treble notes are low during one measure, then go high the next, giving a roller-coaster feel to the melody.

Listening Phase 2 (Arrangement)

Instrumentation [which instruments drive the song?] A drumset, a bass guitar, and an electric guitar. Also, the occasional trumpet.

Structure/Organization [how is the song built?  Order, patterns, etc.] An introduction, a chorus, a bridge, wrapping up with another chorus.

Emotional Architecture [Draw how the song build and drop?] Builds slowly during the introduction into the chorus, falls slightly during the bridge, then stays full steam ahead until the song fades out.

Listening Phase 3 (Sound Quality)

Balance

-       Height [high and low of frequency] Moderately high and low frequencies, but not much in between.

-       Width [stereo panning left/right] Different instruments dominate each ear, giving a sense of space.

-       Depth [layers of instruments] Four for the most of the song (Bass, precussion, treble, vocals), with a fifth layer added later in the song (brass)

Breaking Bad Color Theory: Skylar Versus Marie

Breaking Bad is a quintessential, contemporary example of symbolism in media. This is especially apparent in its use of color, and the color of the characters' outfits throughout the seasons. For this assignment, I chose to analyze Marie and Skylar's outfits throughout the final season. Through use of color, I discovered details of each of the sisters' personalities, and their feelings throughout the tumultuous events of the last season of one of the greatest television dramas of all time. Check it out through the following link:

http://www.timetoast.com/timelines/832252

Section Three Opening Essay

           

Trajan's Column, a unique form of
storytelling in which the plot (literally) wraps
around the tower nearly thirty times.

Today I watched two different videos and one radio show. The first video is called How Art Made the World: Once Upon a Time. It’s a documentary about how the storytelling process has evolved fro the first written languages of Mesopotamia to the sci-fi epics of today. It chronicled the process from written stories, to visual murals, to audiovisual narratives, all the way to the first feature film. Each story seemed impressive in it’s own right, but there was always something missing. For the cuneiform, it was a narrative structure. For Odysseus, it was music. For the aboriginals, it was motion. Today, we have conquered all of those hurdles. With today’s technology, we can literally create worlds. Just look at Avatar. Nearly the entire movie was made on a computer. Despite the simplicity of the plot (and it’s similarity to Pocahontas), it remains a technical marvel that demonstrates how far we’ve come. Compare it to some of the first movies and the difference is staggering. It makes me wonder: 50 years from now, someone will probably make another documentary like this, calling today’s technology “antiquated” and “old-hat.” But why? What will they think of next? Whatever it is, it’ll change the film industry forever.

            The second video I watched is a TED Talk by visual novel artist Scott McCloud (no relation to Fox). He discussed how the comic book industry is struggling to change in the wake of the Information Age. He proposed many offbeat methods of storytelling that, even nine years later, I haven’t heard of. The comic books I’ve seen lately still subscribe to the standard paging and paneling that’s been paramount to modern comics before computers and the Internet. It’s a shame, really. The ideas presented by McCloud are fascinating, but then again, I’m not too surprised that they didn’t take hold. Many of his examples would be too confusing for the layman, who isn’t receptive to change and would likely rather read his comics the same way he has for the last half decade. From what I’ve seen, there are two ways in which comics have adapted to today’s technology. The first is digitalization. Comics are now easily available in a digital format that can be read on many computers and mobile devices. The second is animation. Artists will either give simple animations to certain scenes, characters or text. Sometimes, they may even control which panels of the page the viewer can see, which can be advanced when the user presses a button or touches the screen.

            The radio show I watched is an episode of This American Life from 1999. It’s all about the art of selling. Ira Glass considers selling and pitching to be an art form, even more important than every other art form in existence. In a way, Glass is right. In the film industry, for instance, if you want people to make your screenplay a reality, you must convince them to do so. But one thing can’t carry another. In order for a pitch to be successful, the subject matter has to be good (obviously), but the pitchman needs to be able to persuade his audience. He needs a certain charisma and passion that demonstrates that he’s confident in his work. If your pitch is very good but your screenplay isn’t, you’ll probably fail. If you can’t give a good pitch period, you’ll probably fail. One of the people in the program even suggested using short catchphrases that easily captivate the audience while informing them of the gist of the movie. Consider a movie about a dangerous dog that gets let loose: “Jaws with Paws.” Easily recognizable and catchy, don’t you think?

If you want to enact change, you have to be able to convince the population that it’s the right thing to do, that it’s the way forward. Steve Jobs was especially good at this. Former Apple employee Andy Hertzfeld told of the influence he had, and wrapped it around the idea of a “reality distortion field.” He told of Jobs’ charisma and superb speaking and marketing skills and how it permeated people as they communicated with him. The result of this was that people believed nearly everything he said. The people in This American Life claim that scriptwriters and other people who have to pitch must also become adept pitchmen, perhaps even as good as they are in their main craft. It’s a hugely important process in which countless amount of dollars could be at stake. If you are a comic book writer and you have a radical idea that needs the assistance of a publisher, you’re going to need to do a damn good job of explaining why. You may not have to rely of hyperbolous god terms like “revolutionary,” “life-changing,” or even “for mere mortals,” as Jobs would sometimes quip (you also probably don’t need to make up a word like I just did). Of course, you don’t need to have your own reality distortion field to be effective either. As long as you believe in yourself and your product, it may come naturally for you.*

*Some practice, speech coaching, reality checks, etc. may be required.